First of all, being gay is not a choice that people are making in order to make a statement. It's not like dressing like a Goth, or covering your body in tattoos (not that I see anything wrong with those things either). It's not like choosing to break the law, mug someone, commit murder. They aren't criminals. It's not a deliberate selection of evil over good. In fact, there's nothing evil about it. There isn't even any hate involved. It's about love, and being able to choose who you love. Being gay is no more of a choice than having blue eyes or brown hair. It's part of your genetic make up. You can wear colored contacts and bleach your hair, but ultimately, your roots are your roots. My roots are heterosexual. My good friends, Amy and Danielle have homosexual roots. My love for Greg is no stronger than Danielle's love for Amy. My marriage to Greg should have no more validity than Danielle's marriage to Amy. If Amy died, Danielle would be just as devastated as I would be if Greg died. Love is love, without preference of gender.
I'm pretty certain that recognizing gay marriage will not destroy the fabric of marriage in the United States. Aside from the fact that I love Danielle and Amy, because they are my good friends, and I only want what is best for them, their marriage and what happens in it, has no effect on me or my marriage, just as my marriage has no effect on them. My sister's marriage has no effect on my parent's marriage. My boss's marriage has no effect on my cousin's marriage. Get it? If your gay neighbors get married it's going to change their lives, not yours. If they have a happy marriage and have a family, well then, good for them. They're not asking you to provide for their children or pay their mortgage. They're not asking for anything except a little respect, and the same legal rights that you have. If they get divorced, you don't get divorced. If they are swingers, it doesn't mean you have to join in. What goes on behind closed doors is no one's business except that couple's...unless, of course, they aren't straight.
Gay marriage is not going corrupt our society. Looking back now, does anyone truly believe that the Jews were trying to destroy the fabric of German society? What about African Americans? Is there anyone who still thinks that a person with dark skin should drink from his own water fountain, or stand on the bus? I'm pretty sure the number of people who still agree with the Nazis is fairly small, and those who do believe it are pretty much deemed as crazy, right? I'm betting that in a few decades we are going to reflect on this time in our history and shake our heads at how ignorant and intolerant we were. Really, how are gays going to destroy our society? I'll tell you how - just like the Jews and the blacks. They won't. The destruction comes from those who are so vehemently intolerant and unyielding. Homosexuals don't want to destroy anything. They want to create something ~ the recognition of their right to have a spouse.
I've also heard that it's just about money. Well, in part it is, but don't all marriages take money into account? It's about being given the same financial stability as every other married couple. It's about giving homosexuals the choice to have one partner stay home with the children and still have medical insurance. It's about having access to their spouse's 401K, disability and life insurance. It's about all those things that involve money when a couple gets married - any couple, gay or straight. It's not about your money. It's about their money, so why should you care about that?
While we're at it, let's talk about parenting, because I know many people oppose gays having children. Dear God, why? Again, being gay doesn't make you a bad person. It doesn't mean you are going to molest children or pollute them in any way. We're talking about decent human beings here. Human beings who should be given equal rights to child rearing, and should the marriage fail, they should be given equal rights to custody. If Amy and Danielle have a baby, but Amy carries the child, Danielle isn't any less of a parent than any other adoptive mother or father. The baby will still be hers, cared for with loving and guiding arms from birth. If Danielle is the primary breadwinner in their household, she should be able to carry their child on her health insurance. If Amy and Danielle get divorced, (Heaven forbid!), she should be allowed to seek shared custody of her child and have a legal leg to stand on.
It's also about medical rights - being able to stay with the person you have devoted your entire life to, when they are in the hospital on their death bed, being able to make decisions for that person, being respected and treated with the same compassion as any other person who has just lost a spouse. It's about extending the same common courtesies, respect and rights to every person, period. Do you sense a common theme in this blog?
I understand that a large part of the opposition of gay marriage is in relation to religion. You can believe whatever you want to believe from a religious standpoint. No one is telling you to renounce your faith. Recognizing gay marriage as a government has nothing to do with your church, or my church, or any other church for that matter. It's about legal rights, not religious affirmation. I'm Catholic. I was never confirmed. My first marriage was done at a country club, and ended in divorced. My second marriage was done by a justice of the peace outside of the Catholic church as well. (Gasp!) Greg was confirmed and his first marriage was done in a Catholic church, but he never had it annulled, so technically, our marriage is not recognized by our church, and our children are considered illegitimate. (That's so awesome, isn't it? You didn't know I was such a rebel, did you?) That's the stance the church takes, and that's fine. The church has its rules, but those rules don't keep me from being on Greg's health insurance. They don't keep us from visiting each other in the hospital. They don't take away my right to his life or disability insurance should something terrible happen to him. No one is hollering or picketing because they feel that Greg and I are immoral, living in sin, and passing skewed ideals on to our children. In fact, I think many people would say that we are pretty good citizens, trying our best to make the right decisions and pass those values to our kids. Guess what? Amy and Danielle are good citizens too. They make their life decisions based on faith and benevolence, and they will pass their high standards on to their children too. This isn't about religion. Again, I stand my ground. It's about discrimination, plain and simple.
It's really quite a simple concept. I just don't understand what there is to debate. We are supposed to stand up against bullying, against discrimination, against inequality. Pass the damned legislation, already. We're so much better than this.